12/3/2023 0 Comments Formlabs preform save as gcodecustom slicer to fine control the supports, generated path, calibratio.enable other OS (no need to use visualization in Linux for ex).A few stuff that open protocol/file could do: It’s tedious and random: the end result is not guarantied but by doing so You can learn things about the Form1 and maybe fix some short-coming. So what can be done? Well we are limited to reverse-engineer the FORM file or the USB protocol. These limitations do not exist with the B9 printer, as they decided to release everything as open source. The result is that if you want to use a Linux OS or another slicer, you are restricted (ex: generate internal supports function does not exist in Preform yet). When I’ve discussed with Formlabs during the SF Maker Fair, they confirmed they had no intention to release the USB protocol and the. So if for some reason the auto-generated supports are not working or you want to use a non-official polymer, then you are locked by the closed nature of the product. You get a sleek hardware ( that still needs some tuning) and a polished software (Preform) that does not let you tweak a lot’s of options. The Form1 printer is supposed to be a click and print easy consumer solution. If you want to have access to the final STL with the support structures you should ask Formlabs marketing department directly unfortunately. Current SW version have been ‘upgraded’ to include an encryption that present the extraction of the STL… So this information is only there for historical purpose. So Jack, you’re entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts.NOTE: this post was based on one of the first preform software release that did not have encrypted STL content. Honestly? Yeah, that’s why all of the Top500 supercomputers in the world run windows… And, they were upgraded continuously during that period. I’ve had Linux boxen up for over a year without needing to reboot. No other operating systems in the world crash and burn as much as the various MS OSes do. Hah! BSOD as an acronym came from Windows. The software is closed source, known vulnerabilities are kept from the public, it has been shown to have been backdoored by the NSA, etc., etc… Now, the titlebar in Win7 might be kind of transparent, but other than that, NFW. Heh, say WHAT!? Let’s parse that, shall we?Įr, no, not at all. Why not allow the community to enhance and extend the software? You can obviously have code review and final merge control, but I think you would accellerate development considerably, and get some cool features and platform functionality for free in the process. I just bought the first copy of Windows I’ve ever bought (Win7 Pro), and I must say, I threw up a little in my mouth when I pressed submit.Īs an aside, is there a reason you do not simply OpenSource the code for PreForm? People are buying the hardware, not the software. I have to use Windows in a KVM Virtual Machine on my Debian box just to control the printer - that’s pretty cheesy. Also, many, many ‘makers’ are using Linux as their primary OS. They also have a great plugin capability with Python bindings, so many customer pain points can be quickly remedied by the community. They did it in a very intelligent way, leveraging Open Standards (OpenGL) as the underlying technology for the GUI components, and the program looks and acts identically across Windows, Mac and Linux. Let’s take a look at Blender as a case in point: Blender is a fantastic piece of software designed from the ground up to be cross-OS compatible. If vendors ignore Linux, then more users will not use it - not because it’s not a great OS, but because software they need does not run on it. This kind of thinking is misguided (it’s not worth it to do a Linux port).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |